Many are disappointed with the judiciary, especially the part of the judiciary that judges areas close to politics. And ear pulling drop several Europe (arbitrary sentences in the case Otegi, look the other way in almost all allegations of torture are not investigated ...) and a historical surplus smear (sitting on the bench as a lehendakari political leaders, or shutting down newspapers for everything to end in nothing in the "case Egunkaria" or humiliating the Catalan town of interest from or summaries as 18/98).
Only some professional judgments ('Egunkaria case' or Udalbiltza) and sentences such as those made by the civil guards and Sarasola Portuguese case, the Court points to a path that does not know whether to be or not dominant in its tension eternal between serving justice and enforce the law and serve the tactical interests of the state.
The legalization is not legally untenable:
The future sentence to make the Supreme Court on the case is very important Sortu justice itself and how far can or can not get the political pollution of judicial discretion in clear case.
Letter of the Law on Political Parties hardened and uncheck explicit-established doctrine to violence, a strategy linked to human rights, democratic values \u200b\u200band pluralism and a democratic organizational structure homologous-Amparo Sortu claim flatly. The statutes presented are clean and clear of any trick, to become a public commitment to locals and visitors. No other interpretation than that of an unequivocal commitment to reject political violence, specifically including ETA's violence. It is a historic turning point which also announced a change of mindset: from the 'I am the national construction and anything goes "when I contribute and try to lead it from what we achieved legitimately.
If the content and attitude Sortu party material has been serious, also formally meets none of the promoters has been convicted (not refurbished) for membership in illegal organization. We will not insist on this aspect, although the same requirement is nonetheless absurd. If required to change the nationalist left, will be the same. If there were other, it would be necessary to change.
Nobody in their right mind, except in the ill-informed and discredited by biased reports by the Guardia Civil, police and the like, argues that it is a mockery to overcome a legal obstacle. It is clear that there is no succession of an outlawed party, but split with a strategy, and a relaunch with new intentions, methods, means, organization and operation systems.
Outlawing politically untenable:
Sortu say that is a continuation of Batasuna is the same as saying that the PP is the fascism of Franco. Applying this rule of three, there would be reactionary right now in the English State. Since both the fantasized "brilliant" and amnesic transition shocked that, in that other topic, go to the more formalistic arguments to prevent the transition to a radical pro-independence model of strategy, organization and control different. Will fear.
Rather, it is great and integral to the viability of which have endorsed Sortu significant people in the world of Batasuna, for that, and that alone gives truth and guarantee the political process open internal transition. Otherwise would have been a toast to the sun, or a minority without a future initiative, or a split that would spur the strength of those who remain outside. It is also essential to the process undertaken in fortunes that worked long run aground not on stupidity of others.
If so, would mean that since the authorities do not want peace, but a long, tense, painful and difficult to defeat. This otherwise, it would not have left is that nationalist or nationalism and ETA would prefer a functional and striking bay.
sounds like the same dirty game that put the bar high now intend to upload more. In addition to sabotaging his word, something very dear here, "meaning that less would be the bar (upload to where you can not skip) and what is wanted is the medium-term organic illegality of a significant segment of the population.
Require new requirements are as de facto amend the Political Parties Law and make something that was exceptionally ban a party-in rule. PP is understood that the splash well in the ban. But the Socialists have been those who have brought the appeal and argument is outrageous. Of course it has a double advantage in the world of political hypocrisy and not of principles: if the Supreme Court gives the reason it is confirmed in its case and if it is not given, say that great!, Because it already no doubt there will be quiet and the DB.
Quarantine and disappearances:
The new slogan with the press of the Supreme Court is to deny legalization Sortu, is to implement a quarantine check their will to reject ETA, ETA until it disappears.
The quarantine would be absurd and illegal, because means accepting that he is not legal to make illegal political practices that would be observed to see your progress. Condition
legalization to the demise of ETA is foist responsibility for the actions and the existence of a third party (ETA) to a political agent who has already had three achievements: a unilateral ceasefire, a new opportunity to end a long spiral and a legitimization of violence throughout the current through the proposal of the statutes and obligations militant rejection of such actions. As a test, the latter has already happened to meet the perceived threat of attack on Lopez and Ares from a year ago.
Much less can be asked to remove ETA. This is for two reasons: because they could and because it is a power of their own armed organization or the jurisdiction of the justice system and police. And if these, which have been submitted to ETA and its "environment" heavy-handed repression, they have not achieved so far, can not endorse other failure. To see if it will be that there was also a political problem, and the thing was not only criminals ...!
And Zapatero? How can you throw overboard the opportunity to lead this process morally who already tried with the previous truce, in circumstances much more insecure? How possible for someone who has committed suicide and politically left-deteriorating for the social majorities labor market and pension system for the sake of economic austerity and the benefit of big capital-have qualms to commit suicide a little more, finishing with a problem 50 years and go through the front door? Not understandable.
recent years have not been good for justice, as recognized worldwide. Sortu case gives the Supreme Court the ability to initiate the recovery of lost legitimacy. It's time for law, the rule of law and interpretations of fundamental rights in the most favorable to its exercise. This must would be in a democracy. Iñaki
Zallo Lasagabaster and Ramon. Administrative Law professors and Communication, respectively, of the UPV-EHU.
0 comments:
Post a Comment