In just one day of deliberations following the hearing in just over ten hours, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the nationalist left is not entitled to have a legal party. Faced with the reality of an internal debate that has focused on the democratic and political means as the 'unique' and statutes used to reject all violence - "refusal to openly and unambiguously includes ETA" -, the Board of 61 chose to agree with the issues of faith raised by the State Attorney and Advocacy.
Despite not knowing the basics of the ruling, the Supreme Court has determined that Sortu is continuing as a party outlawed Batasuna.
After the hearing on Monday, in which the police witnesses were unable to provide even a single documentary evidence that ETA had directed the creation of Sortu, and Tuesday's session, which were exposed from the parties, the Board of 61 began at 10.00 hours its deliberations, which stopped at 14.30 for lunch.
components of the Special Board meeting resumed at 16.15 and the failure was not known until 21.45 hours. The sentence must now be drafted and its contents will be known within a few days, but it has emerged that three of the judges will be announced two separate dissenting opinions.
is the first time that a decision of this type contains separate opinions. When TS tried to prevent international initiatives submitted to the European elections in 2009, five judges were dissatisfied, but had no dissenting votes in the sentence, so that is officially adopted unanimously. Second instance
Where known the content of the operative part of which reported yesterday the Supreme Court and the lawyers in their possession Sortu the legal arguments that have been applied for the prohibition of their registration, they may appeal within thirty days of the Constitutional protection of their rights. There are hopes that after the elections, his claim could succeed.
But it should be noted that this is a separate process that usually occurs with the ban on electoral lists. In that case does the electoral calendar, which is priced deadlines. In the current course, because it is an ordinary appeal, there is no time limit. In fact, when it appealed the non-registration of Abertzale Sozialisten Batasuna, took several months to provide a response and, finally, even agreed to process the appeal of lawyers.
This time there is evidence to suggest that his performance might be very different, but that the periods are shortened so as to act before the municipal and provincial elections, even more so considering that the applications must be submitted on 18 April.
Lesmes, Aznar senior
already after noon recess had transcended the rapporteur, Carlos Lesmes, argued for two hours, the prohibition of Sortu registration in the register of political parties.
Cadena Ser said the allegation Lesmes was "overwhelming and difficult to refute." After hearing his presentation, it was the turn for the rest of judges fixate its position.
Room 61 The Supreme Court consists of 16 judges, headed by Carlos Divar. The are the presidents of each of the rooms and judges oldest and most modern in every one of them.
The rapporteur, Carlos Lesmes, was a senior Justice Department during the administrations of Joseph María Aznar. In May 1996, shortly after the arrival of PP at La Moncloa, was appointed director general of conscientious objection. After the 2000 elections, changed the position by the CEO of Relations with the Administration of Justice. This was the term in which the Aznar government raised the Political Parties Law and when there was the banning of Batasuna.
As soon as he met the Supreme Court decision, the English Minister of Justice, Francisco Caamaño, showed his satisfaction. So did officials of the PP, whose efforts will now focus on preventing any person from the nationalist left in any list can be presented to the next municipal and provincial elections. In last night began to sound the first voices of the PP that lobbied the government of Rodriguez Zapatero to be especially attentive and the Inquisition to the movements that may occur in this area.
The sentence, when notified, may be appealed to the Constitutional Court, but he has no time to resolve, since it is not an electoral process, but a regular registration political party.
PNV spokesman in Parliament and Chairman of the GBB Gasteiz, Joseba Egibar, had warned the morning and "ridiculous" that the English courts will "The longer it takes to certify the legality of Sortu." Said that, whether it is legal for the elections, the nationalist left " already has deployed a comprehensive strategy to be " in the polls.
Speaking to ETB, said that "there can be preventive outlawing" , and recalled that the courts have as a tool by law. "From there - he pointed , judge intentions, impressions and other enters the realm of debatable. "
jeltzale leader said that, today, there is still disbelief "that has such a cut and break" in what has been the history of the nationalist left, but said "that fortunately has occurred." "With or without Sortu as legal tab, left-wing nationalism will be present at elections" he said.
also predicted that " to the extent that there is no alternative, with names, etc." , there will be "another twist research on hundreds or thousands people "if they were outlawed training successors.
For its part, the Commonwealth Secretary General, Adolfo Muñoz, Irratia info7 declared that, according to the principles of law, there is no other option but to legalization, but said that since there are instances of the English state in banning political interest which were outside the Supreme Court.
While various PSE leaders insisted during the day when we had to rely on the courts, Antonio Basagoiti insisted that "everyone knows what is and what is Sortu Batasuna", and that what was needed was that the Supreme Court put it seal.
However, once again, the discordant note and put it kooky vice president of the European Popular Group, Jaime Mayor Oreja, who warned that the Supreme Court ruling on the legality of Sortu be "inevitable", even though in which ETA 'land' in the Basque institutions because it is part of a "pact" with Zapatero's government.
Iñaki Iriondo, in GARA
0 comments:
Post a Comment